Can Serious Lamb Still Survive in Western Pennsylvania?
Just because the Jamisons retired a few years ago doesn’t mean the world-class lamb from Pennsylvania is a thing of the past.
A few days ago I was at John and Sukey Jamison’s place for lunch, my first visit since last year. Sukey made a simple potato soup that was so good it reminded me how often the best food is not complicated at all but expresses the beauty of quality ingredients.
Most people know the Jamisons for lamb, and rightly so, but Sukey has a cook’s instinct that goes much deeper than reputation. Years ago she worked on her lamb barley soup with Jean Louis Palladin for months on end, and you can feel that kind of education in the way she thinks and talks about flavor. After lunch John and I walked his pastures and talked through what happened on our farm last summer and what I want to do differently this season. We were not talking about branding or mythology or any of the words people now like to pin to farming. We were talking about grass. Timing. Density. Recovery. Stress. Finish. What a lamb tastes like when you get those things right…or wrong.
That is more or less the center of my life right now.
I raise sheep in western Pennsylvania, and the work is harder than the picture people usually have in mind. The picture is green hills, moving flocks, children in the yard, maybe a dog in the frame if the photographer is lucky. None of that is false… in fact we have a handful of those pictures on the fridge. But it leaves out most of the actual work, and nearly all of the risk.
Lamb lives in a very thin market in this country. It may be the finest meat in the world, but most Americans do not cook it regularly. They buy it for Easter, maybe. They order it in a restaurant once in a while. They say they value pasture-raised meat, local farms, humane treatment, clean food and regenerative agriculture…all of which sounds good and some of which they genuinely mean. But lamb is often where those convictions start to shake. The price is higher. The cuts are less familiar. The comparison point in people’s heads is usually imported meat or supermarket meat raised under an entirely different logic.
So if you are going to raise lamb this way, you cannot afford any sloppiness. Not on the pasture. Not in the handling. Not in the transport. Not at the processor. Not in how the cuts are presented. You can spend months doing a beautiful job on grass and lose a surprising amount of value in a few careless hours later on.
That is why I get uneasy when people talk about farming in broad, flattering categories. Stewardship. Sustainability. Regeneration. I am not against those words. I use some of them myself. But they can get airy in a hurry.
The thing itself is much more exacting. There is fence to move. Water to keep in front of the flock. Minerals. Parasite pressure. Spring snowstorms. Predators. Winter feed. Breeding decisions. Trucking. Slaughter dates. Cut sheets. Freezer space. Cash flow. One bill due while you are still waiting on another check. Children needing you in the house while sheep need you up the hill.
That is the real farm. Not the postcard version.
Last summer John and Sukey came here to the ranch and we had lunch. I made a traditional chicken and dumpling soup with stock and meat from one of our farm-raised broilers. We walked the pastures afterward, and John said something that stayed with me. He commented on the microclimate here…on the rolling hills, the lay of the land, the lake influence, the pasture biodiveristy…how it reminded him of his own farm and also the famed lamb region in Europe. “This place is special. It reminds me of our farm. You can do something real here.” That is not the kind of compliment a man like John throws around for effect. He was noticing something real. The shape of a place. The conditions that might let lamb express itself in a particular way if managed just right. I’ll never forget his words. Were they a compliment or a challenge?
Either way works for us - because what interests me most is not just “farming” or “ranching” or lamb as generic red meat. Not lamb as holiday tradition. What interests me is lamb as something capable of carrying a landscape. Lamb in its most exceptional expression - something chefs desperately want but can’t find from many sources these days, especially with pastures at Jamison Lamb farm having gone fallow these past few years.
People are used to hearing this kind of culinary language about wine. Maybe oysters. Maybe cheese. Meat, much less so, unless perhaps you’re Michael Pollan or Dan Barber. And language like this is rare for lamb least most of all, which is strange, because lamb is one of the most transparent meats there is flavor-wise. You can taste forage in it. You can taste stress in it. You can taste age and timing and handling. A lamb that has lived quietly on good pasture is different. Not in some romantic imaginary way…in an actual sensory way. In the fat. In the aroma. In whether the meat tastes clean and deep or flat and vague.
That is what I am after at Ridgemeade.
I am not trying to imitate another farm. I am not trying to wrap ordinary meat in poetic language and call it special. I am trying to raise lamb that does not taste anonymous. That is a much narrower goal than it might sound. It means the pasture matters. The breed matters. The weather matters. The very terroir and the post-first-frost timing of the finish matters. The handling matters. The butcher matters. The chef matters. It is a golden chain, and if one link gets lazy, the whole thing knows it.
John and Sukey have been incredibly generous with me, but I do not think the real task is to copy the Jamison method like a frozen relic. The real task is to go deeper into the same sources that shaped it in the first place. John was influenced by André Voisin’s Grass Productivity, which deserves to be read more carefully than it often is. Not skimmed for slogans…read. There is a difference.
I have also had the good fortune to work closely with Russ Wilson of Wilson Land and Cattle, who has become both a friend and a trusted sounding board. Russ brings a level of grazing intelligence that is practical, disciplined, and very alive - unlike anything I’ve ever seen. So in a sense I do not feel that we are changing the old standard so much as returning to the root of it, with him at our side, and pressing even further.
That matters because the old standard was not aesthetic. It was culinary.
People forget that. They assume a farm like this is mostly about ethics or nostalgia or old time charm. Those things are not irrelevant, but they are not the point. The point is flavor. The point is whether the final product has enough integrity that a serious chef notices it immediately. The point is whether the meat says anything when it hits the pan.
That is why my regular calls, and visits, and lunches with people like John and Sukey means something deeply personal to me. You cannot separate the pasture from the table. Sukey’s potato soup was humble food, but it came from a mind trained by years of paying attention to fine details. John does not walk a pasture thinking only in terms of yield. He thinks about what the animal becomes. He thinks about sunlight and sage, wild carrot and how they translate into tenderness and aroma. Pasture and kitchen are not necessarily separate worlds. Instead there is really one world…grass, animal, kitchen, plate.
I think a lot about that here. I think about it when I am moving sheep in the lake wind. I think about it when I am looking at stockpiled pasture and deciding whether it is really ready. I think about it when I am trying to hold a line between what is best for the land, what is best for the sheep, and what will still let this farm remain financially alive. That last part is the one people like to blur. They talk as if a family farm can live on moral approval. It cannot. It has to sell food. And if the food is going to command the kind of price that keeps the farm going, it had better be worth it.
That is where a lot of small livestock agriculture has gotten hurt. Farms have been squeezed for years between rising costs and a market trained to expect cheap meat. Some got bigger. Some got cheaper. Most lowered standards to compete. Many disappeared. What remains, at least among the farms worth paying attention to, is not quaintness. It is precision. It is farms getting more exacting because they have no room left not to be.
I do not know if this model will win in the long run. I am not writing from some place of grand certainty. I know how fragile the chain is. I know how much depends on the infrastructure that has already thinned out. I know how much can go wrong between grass and plate. But I also know what I have tasted, and I know what people like John and Sukey have spent their lives proving. Lamb raised carefully, on the right ground, with the right attention, is undoubtedly one of the finest meats in the world.
Western Pennsylvania still has the bones for that, and more specifically, our incredible microclimate at the highest elevation on this ridge. I truly believe that. The hills. The weather. The grass. The chefs. The memory of a standard that was real and bar-setting the world around. My job is not to sentimentalize any of it. My job is to see whether that standard can still be lived here now, under present conditions, with the guidance of the Jamisons and others who understand what it takes. To see if that standard can be lived by a real, small family trying to make a real, small ranch work.
That is what Ridgemeade is for.
The sheep do not care about any of this language. They put their heads down and move into the next bite. The work, for me, is to make sure that care in the pasture survives all the way to the plate…without getting diluted, rushed, or talked to death along the way.